Selling Haunted Houses Involves Concerns for Lawsuits Alleging Failure of Disclosure

Question: Is a seller legally required to disclose if a house is haunted in Canada?

Answer: While Canadian law mandates sellers to reveal latent defects that may affect a property's safety or usability, disclosing a suspected haunting isn't legally required. However, spreading rumours about a haunted property, as seen in 1784773 Ontario Inc. v. K-W Labour Association et al, 2013 ONSC 5401, can lead to legal issues. Avoid potential disputes by maintaining full disclosure on material defects when selling a home. Need guidance?

Answer: Contact Olson Craig Legal for a free consultation to ensure peace of mind during your real estate transactions.

Does the Seller of a House Need to Disclose That the House Is Haunted to the Buyer?

A Lawsuit Regarding a Haunted House Maybe Unlikely; However, a Seller Can Avoid Legal Troubles By Providing Full Disclosure to a Buyer and Refraining From Statements That Risk Stigmatizing a Property.

Understanding the Law Regarding Disclosure Obligations When Selling a House Perceived As Haunted

The case of 1784773 Ontario Inc. v K-W Labour Association et al, 2013 ONSC 5401, suggests that a seller who jokes about selling a haunted house may be subsequently sued by the buyer for failure to disclose the haunted status.  Subsequently, the buyer brought at a lawsuit and alleged that the haunted house rumour caused reduced realty value due to the stigma arising from such a rumour as well as for the failure of the seller to disclose the haunted status during the sales negotiations with the buyer.

The Law

On the issue of proper disclosure within realty transactions, the law in Canada appears clear that the seller has a duty to disclose to the buyer any latent defects in the property that may pose a danger or make the house uninhabitable.  This rule was established by the Ontario Court of Appeal in the case of McGrath v. MacLean et al., 1979 CanLII 1691.

In regards to failing to disclose that a house is haunted, in the 1784773 Ontario Inc. case, it was determined that whereas the haunted house statements were made jokingly and whereas the buyer was unable to provide proof that the house was haunted, the case was dismissed.  Accordingly, whether would find a seller liable if evidence of paranormal activity was available remains unknown.  Another interesting case involving a haunted house, was the Manitoba Free Press v. Nagy, [1907] S.C.R. 340, decision of the Supreme Court of Canada which involved allegations of negligence against a newspaper for publishing an article suggesting that a vacant house was haunted and thereby causing a reduction in the property value of the house.

Summary Comment

Although the likelihood of being sued for spreading rumours that a house is haunted is unlikely, sellers, among others, are best to avoid the risk of a legal hassle by providing full disclosure when selling a property. Subsequently, avoiding the spread of rumours about the property is wise.