Selling Haunted Houses

Question: Is a seller legally required to tell a buyer that a house is haunted in Ontario?

Answer: In Ontario, a seller is generally required to disclose known latent defects that could make the home dangerous or uninhabitable, but there is usually no clear legal rule that a “haunted” reputation alone must be disclosed. Courts have considered claims tied to haunted-house comments, including 1784773 Ontario Inc. v K-W Labour Association, 2013 ONSC 5401, where joking statements without proof were dismissed, and the risk may be higher if there is evidence and the information is actually material.   To reduce disputes, sellers can avoid stigmatizing remarks and ensure any relevant known issues are disclosed through proper realty documentation, and buyers can ask for full disclosures before closing. If you need lawyer and paralegal help with seller or buyer disclosure duties, contact Olson Craig Legal at (226) 886-2001 in Ontario to optimize your position before the deal closes.

Add this website to Google Preferred Sources

Is a Seller Legally Required to Tell a Buyer That a House Is Haunted?

A Lawsuit Regarding a Haunted House Maybe Unlikely; However, a Seller Can Avoid Legal Troubles By Providing Full Disclosure to a Buyer and Refraining From Statements That Risk Stigmatizing a Property.

Understanding the Law Regarding Disclosure Obligations When Selling a House Perceived As Haunted

The case of 1784773 Ontario Inc. v K-W Labour Association et al, 2013 ONSC 5401, suggests that a seller who jokes about selling a haunted house may be subsequently sued by the buyer for failure to disclose the haunted status.  Subsequently, the buyer brought at a lawsuit and alleged that the haunted house rumour caused reduced realty value due to the stigma arising from such a rumour as well as for the failure of the seller to disclose the haunted status during the sales negotiations with the buyer.

The Law

On the issue of proper disclosure within realty transactions, the law in Canada appears clear that the seller has a duty to disclose to the buyer any latent defects in the property that may pose a danger or make the house uninhabitable.  This rule was established by the Ontario Court of Appeal in the case of McGrath v. MacLean et al., 1979 CanLII 1691.

As for the concern involving failure to disclose that a house is haunted, the court in the 1784773 Ontario Inc. case determined that as the statements regarding the haunted status were made jokingly and the Plaintiff was without actual evidence to prove that the house was actually haunted, the case was dismissed.  Of course, it is interesting to wonder what the decision of the court would be if some evidence of paranormal activity was available.  Another interesting case involving a haunted house, was the Manitoba Free Press v. Nagy, [1907] S.C.R. 340, decision of the Supreme Court of Canada which involved allegations of negligence against a newspaper for publishing an article suggesting that a vacant house was haunted and thereby causing a reduction in the property value of the house.

Summary Comment

The chances of getting sued for spreading a rumour that a house is haunted is slim, a former owner of a house should avoid spreading rumours that may adversely affect the value of the property. A seller limits the risk of legal trouble by providing proper disclosure during the selling process and thereafter keeping quiet.